Archive for the 'Individual Freedoms' Category

Photographs like this may soon become illegal!

Sack Parliament Protest, London, 2006

Yep! According to some proposed legislation currently “going through the process” apparently I could get up to ten years in jail for taking a photograph like the above and publishing it in future!

Read Terror Law and Photography on photojournalist Marc Vallee’s blog.

Worrying implications indeed!

As an article on Indymedia so succinctly puts it:

“If a police officer behaves badly and oppressively we [activists] have been known to criticise them on the internet. Furthermore it has always been commonsense to jot down police collar numbers on demos and take photos a) for legal reasons to identify police breaking the law, to identify police behaving well, to help clarify matters in both criminal and civil courts. Intelligence on police gathered by activists has helped to acquit innocent activists, enabled activists to sue police and correctly identify the culprits. None of this has ever been used in order to use violence against the police let alone terrorism but we can hazard a guess that they might use this proposed legislation against us. What if MI5 infiltrate a group and that agent is discovered? Will it become an offence to warn other activists? Will it be an offence to after having suspicions raised about a fellow activist to make a few enquiries if the “activist” is an undercover cop?”

And there’s some related info on Indymedia here.

At the very least this proposed legislation will constitute yet another encroachment on individual freedoms in this country whilst at the same time giving even greater power and freedom from accountability to the cops, thereby edging us one step closer to becoming a true Police State.

As well as making the job of the photojournalist that much more difficult than it already is.

Also posted at Adventures of an Idiot

More on my previous post about this year’s Climate Camp

Further to the totally disproportionate policing of this year’s Camp at Kingsnorth in Camp, the following Press Release has just been issued by the media people at the Climate Camp website…

Police spend £6 million on heavy handed policing of Kingsnorth Climate Camp

23 September 2008
For immediate release

A Freedom of Information request made by the BBC has revealed that the
cost of policing the Camp for Climate Action in Kent in August came to
£5.9 million.

The policing of the camp, including indiscriminate use of stop and search,
frequent use of helicopters and a number of violent incursions on to the
camp over the course of the week, was accused of being ‘heavy handed’ and
‘disproportionate’ by critics ranging from MEP Caroline Lucas to Labour MP
Colin Challen.

“This has been an outrageous waste of public money,” said camp participant
Kevin Smith. “It’s money that has been spent protecting E.On’s profit
margins, clamping down on people’s civil liberties and trying to prevent a
much needed public debate on coal and climate change from taking place.”

“This £6 million wasn’t just spent on the day of action against
Kingsnorth,” said Janie Shiraz. “It was mostly spent over the course of
the week in stopping and searching every man, woman and child entering the
site, it was spent keeping local residents awake with the helicopter all
night, and it was spent on police running around on site with nothing to
do as people sat in tents trying to talk about climate change.
‘Disproportionate response’ doesn’t even begin to cover it.”

Wainscott resident Andy Rogers said: “I attended the camp and I feel that
the underhanded and incredibly intimidating use of political policing at
the camp was an out and out infringement of my human rights, including my
freedom of speech and the right under law to attend a peaceful protest.
Surely six million pounds of what is essentially tax payers’ money would
have been better spent introducing a moratorium on coal fired power
stations”.

Camp for Climate Action activists have vowed to target the power station
and its owners E.ON with an ongoing direct action campaign if approval is
given for a new plant.

ENDS

For more information, phone 07772 861 099 or 0793 209 6677, or email
press (at) climatecamp.org.uk

www.climatecamp.org.uk

Extending the Surveillance State

Came across this today on the Guardian’s website

The police ANPR database, which the Guardian today reveals will retain information from 50 million road journeys a day for five years, is a system that was never sanctioned or debated in parliament and which threatens the freedom of movement, assembly and protest.

Presented simply as a tool to fight crime and terror by the police, it will become one of the cornerstones of the surveillance state, and will give the police far too much power to track, in real time, the movement of people who may be bound for legitimate demonstrations and protest rallies.

Linked with the government’s proposals to seize all our communications data to be announced in the Queen’s speech this autumn, this move signifies a profound change in our society and an irreversible transfer of power from free individuals to the state.

Read the full article here.

Even if you weren’t before its now time to start being very worried!

Benefit data discs held for year - Yahoo News UK

And we really want to trust the Government to safely and securely implement/maintain a National ID Card scheme?…

Benefit data discs held for year - Yahoo News UK
The Conservatives have branded a report that an ex-contractor at the DWP had two discs with thousands of benefit claimants details for more than a year “disturbing”.
publicitéThe News of the World reports that two discs were found at the home of a former contractor to the Department for Work and Pensions.

The worker discovered that she had inadvertently forgotten to return the discs when her work with the DWP finished - and expressed her surprise that no one had checked that she had done so.

The two new missing discs reveal what kind of benefits the people receive. The data on the discs can be accessed by any standard computer and is not encrypted or protected by a password.

The blunder comes days after the Government was forced to admit it had lost the personal details of more than 25 million people in the post.

That crisis was sparked when a junior official at HM Revenue & Customs official in Tyne and Wear sent two unencrypted CDs containing details of child benefit claimants by courier to the National Audit office in London. The discs were not recorded or registered.

Shadow work and pensions secretary Chris Grayling said of the latest blunder: “This is an exceptionally disturbing new development involving highly sensitive personal information.

“The fact that it hasnt been copy protected is further evidence of a cavalier attitude towards data protection in Government departments. Ministers need to explain urgently how they are going to put things right.”

On Saturday it emerged confidential information on millions of investors is regularly being sent through the post to HM Revenue and Customs without proper security.

Investment managers in the City are required to mail personal data on their clients to HMRC on unencrypted computer discs despite the recent outcry.

The odd things I come across…

In my ramblings around the Web I frequently stumble across strange and potentially alarming snippets. Here’s one such. Is it a hoax? Or unwarranted paranoia?

Some years ago a friend of mine (a frequent visitor to the U.S.) put to me that this country is about 15 years behind America in most things. So, if not hoax, or unwarranted paranoia, is this the shape of things to come over here as well?…

AS A Radio Talk Show Host, I… « THE “G” BLOG @WordPress.com
North Bergen, NJ — As a radio talk show host, I receive a whole slew of e-mail and regular mail about virtually every issue under the sun. Much of it gets deleted or thrown away. Some of it results in stories appearing on my web site or being discussed on my show. Every once in awhile, something akin to a bombshell arrives and yesterday, July 18, 2007 was one such day.

I came into possession of portions of a U.S. military plan which was allegedly classified “Top Secret.” This put me in a bind because without having a security clearance myself, having something which is Classified is unlawful. Reading such a document is also unlawful and revealing it to the public is definietly unlawful. So, I thought about it. I decided screw it, I’m going to read it.

As I read the document, my blood ran cold. Chills ran up my spine. The hair on the back of my neck stood up. My gut started churning. This document is an operational plan to use U.S. military troops against U.S. Citizens!

Read the full post

And just in case there’s an outside chance that its all perfectly genuine, I’ve mirrored the extract from the document that the above blog has published here!

Open letter to the Commissioner, Metropolitan Police

Open letter, due to safety issues involved with delivering letters to New Scotland Yard (ie henchmen in uniforms with guns arresting peaceful people armed with… …letters!).www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/07/345451.html

On behalf of Mr Brian W Haw, Parliament Square Peace Campaign, to commissioner:-
Today, 5th October 2007, I hereby serve upon you a copy of an application made under section 59(2) Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001, at Southwark Crown Court relating to Mr Brian Haw & Co.’s property stolen by you/your henchmen on 23rd May 2006.

I remind you that you are now required, within 7 days, to (a) notify Mr Haw and the Court officer whether you are making representations and appearing at the hearing; and (b) if you wish to make representations, a WRITTEN (I understand you have problems with reducing things to writing - ie authorisations under SOCPA) statement setting out such representations.

Steven Jago,
for and on behalf of Mr Brian W Haw.

To public:

Brian Haw & Co. would like to re-assure members of the public that protest around Parliament is in fact - not banned - yet - and visitors to the 24/7 “As Long As It Takes” Parliament Square Peace Campaign this Monday, 8th October 2007 are very welcome to see the new banner display before the old one is restored to its former home.

Both Brian and the Burmese protests are continuing on Monday as normal, so you can see both displays while visiting. You will of course also be able to see Mayor ken livingstone’s illegal barriers in Parliament Square - an attempt to severely curtail peaceful campaigning.

SteveJ
e-mail: stevej_appalled(at)yahoo.co.uk
Homepage: www.parliament-square.org

 

As published on Indymedia

Burma video clip



Support the people of Burma



Free Burma!

Arrested for radical politics… in America

Update on the Ed & Elaine Brown situation

Radical politics tied to charges

Crimes and Corruption of the New World Order News

Officials say Cohoes man arrested this week is among supporters of couple who are defying U.S. government

First published: Friday, September 14, 2007
COHOES — A local man, arrested by federal authorities in a multi-state raid this week, was among four men who spent time in New Hampshire, providing a convicted tax-evading couple with food, weapons and support, authorities said Thursday.

In coordinated roundups in four states Wednesday, officials swooped down on Daniel J. Riley and three others named in an indictment returned by a federal grand jury in New Hampshire.

Riley, 39, of Cohoes was among the friends of Ed and Elaine Brown, who have barricaded themselves in their secluded Plainfield, N.H., home since being convicted by a federal jury in January of scheming to avoid federal income taxes by hiding $1.9 million in income between 1996 and 2003. In April, they were sentenced in absentia to more than five years in prison.

Riley, a gun collector, was confronted in the driveway of his home at 62 Younglove Ave. and tried to run but got only about 15 yards, law enforcement officials said. He is accused of obstructing justice and being an accessory to the Browns’ crimes.

“We were aware of him based on what was going on up in New Hampshire,” Chief Deputy U.S. Marshal Ted Gloo said Thursday. He said local marshals were waiting for the go-ahead from New Hampshire authorities.

Riley is “an associate and supporter of Ed Brown, and that’s very well known not only from what we learned from an investigation but from his (Brown’s) own Web site,” said Gloo, who is stationed in Syracuse but was in Albany for part of this week.

“We got word about a week ago that an arrest warrant was going to be issued at which time we would act on it,” Gloo said. It was issued Tuesday and sent to Albany. “We put a plan together as to what we were going to do in conjunction to what they had going on in other locations.”

Taken from the Cohoes property were several weapons, the marshal said, including a .50-caliber high-powered rifle and several assault rifles, including AK-47s. He said he was unaware of any handguns.

“We are still trying to determine with the ATF the legality of him having those,” Gloo said.

Riley has no felony convictions, so he could own some of the weapons legally, authorities said.

The 2 p.m. raid was led by federal marshals, including members of the Capital District Fugitive Task Force. Assisting marshals were Cohoes police and the State Police violent felony warrant squad. The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was called in after the weapons were found.

Riley, who lists his occupation as electrician/handyman, has visited the Browns in recent months, officials said. The couple, who are holed up in their mountaintop, concrete-fortified home, has provisions to sustain them for more than a year and have threatened a gun battle should authorities attempt to take them.

Power has been cut off to the Browns’ home in an attempt to disable their telephone and Internet service. But authorities believe the house has generators, and the Browns have kept in touch with sympathizers through prepaid cellphones supplied by many of their supporters, officials said. The Browns’ home sits on an isolated dirt road and includes a turret that offers a 360-degree view of the property.

Marshals nationwide have had their eye on the Browns’ home as well as on sympathizers who support the anti-government movement and regularly visit the couple and carry their message that there is no law requiring them to pay taxes.

In June, Riley visited the Browns. While walking the couple’s dog near the home, he was arrested by marshals. After being detained for a short period, he was released without being charged.

Federal authorities said Riley’s criminal past includes low-level convictions, none of them felonies. After his arrest this week, he was arraigned before Magistrate Judge Randolph Treece in Albany and immediately extradited to New Hampshire to face the indictment.

In addition to the accessory after the fact charge, Riley and the others were charged with conspiracy to impede or injure a law enforcement officer, possession and use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence and conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States.

Also taken into custody during the raids were Cirino Gonzales, 30, of Alice, Texas; Jason Gerhard, 22, of Brookhaven, Suffolk County; and Robert Wolffe, 50, of Randolph, Vt. Gonzales was arrested in his hometown, Gerhard at Fort Leonard Wood, Mo., and Wolffe in Hartford, Vt.

Carol DeMare can be reached at 454-5431 or by e-mail at cdemare@timesunion.com. Research by Sarah J. Hinman

The Associated Press also contributed to this story

Climate Camp Tales

I have to confess, its not entirely unknown for me to be somewhat scathing of the cops.
Not generally when they’re performing their normal “bobby-type” duties you understand (although even then I’ve had a few run-ins with the traffic cops from time to time) but moreso when they’re peforming tasks that could be perceived as serving a political agenda. Like providing protection for war criminals (a la the G8 summit) or for arms dealers, or snooping on innocent protesters, or suppressing legitimate political dissent.
And I’m not overly impressed with their deceitfulness (sometimes moving over into actual lying), their hypocrisy, their bully-boy tactics, their preconceptions, and their seeming inability to distinguish between hardened criminals and political activists (who generally are fairly law-abiding folk but with a social conscience).

However, I’m not exactly one of those journalist-types that seem to be anti-police regardless of circumstance - almost on principle, sort of thing.
Almost inevitably at any gathering of activists where the cops are likely to be lurking one hears the old refrain “Don’t talk to the cops. Even when they seem to be ok they’ll only try to get information from you”.
Well, let me set the record straight: that’s only a generalisation, and more often than not completely untrue - and I think I’m probably old enough now to recognise fishing when it occurs!

There are few events I’ve attended where at some stage or other I’ve not talked to one or another of the assembled boys in blue, and its not been very often where an attempt’s been made to elicit info from me. Sure, its happened occasionally, and my normal reaction is simply to deflect the probe.
More often than not responses (if I’ve initiated the exchange) are formal bordering on dismissive (yeah, I can see in their eyes that they think I’m scum!), but just occasionally I’ve had really good conversations. Ok, not very often, but it does happen.

You can put some sort of rationale to this (if you want) along the lines of trying to touch their humanity, or demonstrating to them that those engaged in, or seeking to report fairly on, protests are not just a bunch of wasters and scumbags, or whatever.
But the truth is simply that I’m the sort of person who prefers to be on good terms with folk unless they give me cause not to be. And that applies almost regardless of who they are (I’d probably draw the line at Tony Blair, George Bush et al, but hey, none of us are perfect!).
Sure, I can shout abuse with the best of them if occasion demands it, and I’ve a few sharp responses for those that try to talk down to me, but generally I find it preferable not to deliberately alienate people, providing I don’t have to compromise the things in which I believe.

So, having now probably laid the groundwork for arguments with some of the more die-hard activists, I can proceed with the tale.

One of the roles I found myself fulfilling at this year’s Climate Camp was that of photographer - in various capacities. Camp Photographer, photographer for the FitWatch people, and journalist-type person (see this post).
Well, certainly in the last two of those capacities I found myself almost literally rubbing shoulders periodically with the activists’ dreaded foe.
A few exchanges and conversations occurred, some of which were ok, others leaving me muttering “bastard” and similar expressions.

But one stands out head and shoulders above the rest. I’m convinced that I’ve finally met a copper who’s actually a real human being!

Chief Inspector Pendry of (would you believe it) the Metropolitan Police!!!

The first encounter was at second-hand and occurred in the village of Harmondsworth where the Kids Block march had come to a temporary halt, the cops wanting to go one way, the marchers another. So there was a rather noisy assembly at the crossroads leading into the village, the locals siding with the protesters and the cops determined not to give way.
But, although noisy and a few “pleasantries” tossed from either side, there was no real trouble.

So it was with complete astonishment that suddenly, out of the blue, a squad of riot cops in full gear comes trotting toward the crowd.
Unfortunately a mate and I were positioned between the protesters and the oncoming intimidators and my one thought was “Shit, we’re in trouble now”, rapidly followed by swivelling head to see if I could spot a hole to crawl into.
Didn’t stop me from firing off a few photos though and whilst so engaged some guy with a PA system (it may even have been the Rinky-Dink crew) drew everyone’s attention to what was happening.
Moments later, after milling around like lost sheep, the squad simply turned tail and disappeared from whence they came.
Then my mate reports to me that he’d overheard some senior cop (my Chief Inspector Pendry as I later learned) shouting the classic phrase “What the f*** are they doing here upsetting my protesters?” (or words to that effect!).

I found the notion that she’d sort of adopted the marchers as “her protesters” curiously delightful, reinforced by the sheer relief at seeing the nasties scurry away tails between legs. In fact, something about their entire behaviour reminded me a lot of the Keystone Kops.

The dilemma of which way the march should go was shortly thereafter settled to the relative satisfaction of all (some sort of compromise having been worked out) and everyone peacefully wandered down to the village green for a brief stop and a mingling with the locals.

I did hear tell that some of the cops just couldn’t shed their control mentality though, and sought to prevent access to the local hostelries. But apparently a landlord of one of the pubs made plain his dismay at losing out on such wonderful potential trade, and the cops moved away.
Not that my mate and I were too bothered; we’d already snuck in for our refreshments.

Eventually the assembly moved off, back up to the crossroads in resumption of the march to BAA.

At some stage along the route my mate and I, being way out in front with other media people, found ourselves talking with this police-type person mainly to find out what the current route was, and whether we were actually going in the right direction.
Turns out this is none other than the admirable Chief Inspector.

Well, the brief exchange turned into a conversation that, on and off, lasted virtually the rest of the march.
Not once did she try pumping us for information. Not once did she utter a single derogatory remark about the protesters, or the Camp itself. Indeed at one point she confessed to being somewhat impressed by the hardiness of the Campers spending a week-long sojourn in a field in not the best of weather.

She even shared with us where along the route we’d find somewhere for a quick cup of coffee and a toilet! (Vital things to know when you’re engaged in this sort of activity.)

The only explanation we could come up with to explain this completely bizarre behaviour was that she didn’t actually realise we were “embedded media” so to speak.
But now I doubt even that. For when we saw her again the following day her attitude toward us was exactly the same, yet its inconceivable that by then she hadn’t discovered, or been informed, of who we were.

Ok, the whole thing may just have been a huge con intended to lull us into changing our perception of the cops. But somehow I think not. She came across to both my mate and I as being perfectly genuine (and I think we’ve both probably had enough encouters to distinguish between false sincerity and the real thing). Yet even if we were both taken in, she’s gotta score big-time in terms of PR for the Met.
Perhaps if there were a few more like her events such as Climate Camp wouldn’t be so stressful for either side.

Chief Inspector Pendry… you’re worthy of respect!





“C’mon lads, let’s get ‘em!”

 


” ‘ang on a minute, someone don’t look too pleased”

 


“Oops… s’pose we’d best go back the way we came”


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.