More on my previous post about this year’s Climate Camp

Further to the totally disproportionate policing of this year’s Camp at Kingsnorth in Camp, the following Press Release has just been issued by the media people at the Climate Camp website…

Police spend £6 million on heavy handed policing of Kingsnorth Climate Camp

23 September 2008
For immediate release

A Freedom of Information request made by the BBC has revealed that the
cost of policing the Camp for Climate Action in Kent in August came to
£5.9 million.

The policing of the camp, including indiscriminate use of stop and search,
frequent use of helicopters and a number of violent incursions on to the
camp over the course of the week, was accused of being ‘heavy handed’ and
‘disproportionate’ by critics ranging from MEP Caroline Lucas to Labour MP
Colin Challen.

“This has been an outrageous waste of public money,” said camp participant
Kevin Smith. “It’s money that has been spent protecting E.On’s profit
margins, clamping down on people’s civil liberties and trying to prevent a
much needed public debate on coal and climate change from taking place.”

“This £6 million wasn’t just spent on the day of action against
Kingsnorth,” said Janie Shiraz. “It was mostly spent over the course of
the week in stopping and searching every man, woman and child entering the
site, it was spent keeping local residents awake with the helicopter all
night, and it was spent on police running around on site with nothing to
do as people sat in tents trying to talk about climate change.
‘Disproportionate response’ doesn’t even begin to cover it.”

Wainscott resident Andy Rogers said: “I attended the camp and I feel that
the underhanded and incredibly intimidating use of political policing at
the camp was an out and out infringement of my human rights, including my
freedom of speech and the right under law to attend a peaceful protest.
Surely six million pounds of what is essentially tax payers’ money would
have been better spent introducing a moratorium on coal fired power
stations”.

Camp for Climate Action activists have vowed to target the power station
and its owners E.ON with an ongoing direct action campaign if approval is
given for a new plant.

ENDS

For more information, phone 07772 861 099 or 0793 209 6677, or email
press (at) climatecamp.org.uk

www.climatecamp.org.uk

Climate Camp 2008

_MG_6592

Located this year at Kingsnorth in Kent, where it is proposed that a new coal-fired power station will be constructed by e.on, the energy giant.

And this year’s Climate Camp attracted a higher level of repressive policing than I’ve witnessed at any of the events I’ve attended over the past few years.
Policing that went way beyond what any reasonable person would consider necessary, and set against a backdrop of smear stories and inflammatory allegations (such as the supposed “discovery” of “caches of weapons”) that bore little resemblance to anything I saw “on the ground”.

Yet despite all that the Camp still attracted a record number of people, with estimates putting the figure at more than either of the previous two Camps (the first at Drax in Yorkshire, the second at Heathrow), and still managed to successfully launch a number of protest actions.

And, on-site, the people were as friendly as ever, and just as eager to share their knowledge and skills with those who are only know engaging with the issue of climate change and related problems.

Its such a shame that the police still haven’t yet realised that Climate Camp protesters are not the real criminals. That honour must surely lie at the door of the big corporations that continue to pollute and destroy our environment in the name of profit… and the governments that support them.

For my own personal account of my week at Climate Camp see this article at TawNews.
And photos are on Flickr, mirrored on Envirospeak.

SG107396

Incommunicado

As of Sunday 3rd (i.e., the day after tomorrow!) don’t expect much activity either on this blog or my photoblog for a few days. Well, prob’ly closer to a coupla weeks actually.
For I be off on my rambles again. This time to the Climate Camp that’s even now in process of being set up near Kingsnorth Power Station in northeast Kent.

Well, I say “in process of being set up”. That’s when they can manage to do the setting up in between bully-boy incursions by the local Gestapo… um, sorry, I meant political police. Um… no, what I actually meant was “officers of Kent’s constabulary”.

Apparently, within 24 hours or so of the site being “claimed” the local boys in blue swarmed all over the place, searching, using pepper spray, arresting, and generally being a bit intimidatory. Nothing new there then.

No doubt they saw it as payback time for when a police incursion was made at the Climate Camp last year, situated near Heathrow.
A detachment of cops marched on… and were very promptly marched off again by the assembled campers, who quite rightly objected to such arrogant tactics. A few red faces in the cop canteen that night probably.
In fact, thinking about it, the cops didn’t have a very good time of it last year. What with being unceremoniously ejected from the Camp and then, in Harmondsworth village, the lovely Chief Inspector Pendry sending a detachment of riot cops away with a flea in their ear (see this), they’ve got a lot of ground to make up.
Which is to say nothing of one cop being thrown from her horse in the “Battle of the Beanfield”.

So, this time around they have apparently managed to seize a number of items that they claim could be used to cause criminal damage, including such offensive things as kids’ crayons and a couple of board games. Wow!
And that’s to say nothing of their seizure of stuff intended to help construct the camp and make it a relatively comfortable, safe, and hygienic place for later arrivals. (Bearing in mind its not just your hardened activist that comes to Climate Camp, but also folk who simply want to find out about the issues, or learn the skills required to develop an environmentally friendly and sustainable lifestyle, and elderly people, and disabled folk, and kids… in other words, a fairly representative cross-section of society as a whole.)

This article on Indymedia has the full story.

Yet the Camp’s not toally without supporters in the Establishment. Check out this article by the parliamentarian Chris Davies published in today’s Guardian newspaper, which also gives some background to the issues that the Camp’s all about.

Of course, there’s a subtext to this recent escapade by the cops. Quite aside from any “legitimate” reason they may claim to have for such heavy-handed policing, one can’t help but wonder whether part of their ploy is not just to “assert their authority” but also to deter others from coming to the Camp.
That motivation (i.e., the suppression of political dissent and activism) quite clearly has a large part to play in their deployment of FIT officers at “political” events, so its reasonable to suppose that such motivation may well have informed this recent “raid”.

So when are they gonna wake up and realise that if anything it just makes the committed activist even more determined to act, as much in protest against the repression as against the issue at hand.

And talking of FIT, fitwatch have today circulated a callout for fitwatchers to come to the Camp. I quote:

“please forward x

Celebrate Fitwatch’s 1st Birthday at Climate Camp

This year’s Climate Camp will also celebrate Fitwatch’s first outing to a major protest. Since then we have gone from strength to strength.
Use Fitwatch tactics all week, and join us to celebrate our anniversary on the day of mass action (9th August). Together we can render the FIT ineffective, and you too can experience the pleasure of forcing a cameraman to retreat.

During the year, we have received criticism on our blog for being “professional protesters”. However, we agree. We take protest seriously. We want to be effective, and to do this we need reclaim our anonymity.
Fitwatch - bring the professional back into protesting!”

Needless to say, this heightened cop activity right from the off won’t deter me from my plans, as I suspect goes for a lot of other folk as well.

So there you have it. Blogging silence from me for at least a week or so (who was that who just said “Phew, thank heaven for that”?).

Oh, almost forgot to mention… the Climate Camp website’s here!

Climate Camp Tales

I have to confess, its not entirely unknown for me to be somewhat scathing of the cops.
Not generally when they’re performing their normal “bobby-type” duties you understand (although even then I’ve had a few run-ins with the traffic cops from time to time) but moreso when they’re peforming tasks that could be perceived as serving a political agenda. Like providing protection for war criminals (a la the G8 summit) or for arms dealers, or snooping on innocent protesters, or suppressing legitimate political dissent.
And I’m not overly impressed with their deceitfulness (sometimes moving over into actual lying), their hypocrisy, their bully-boy tactics, their preconceptions, and their seeming inability to distinguish between hardened criminals and political activists (who generally are fairly law-abiding folk but with a social conscience).

However, I’m not exactly one of those journalist-types that seem to be anti-police regardless of circumstance - almost on principle, sort of thing.
Almost inevitably at any gathering of activists where the cops are likely to be lurking one hears the old refrain “Don’t talk to the cops. Even when they seem to be ok they’ll only try to get information from you”.
Well, let me set the record straight: that’s only a generalisation, and more often than not completely untrue - and I think I’m probably old enough now to recognise fishing when it occurs!

There are few events I’ve attended where at some stage or other I’ve not talked to one or another of the assembled boys in blue, and its not been very often where an attempt’s been made to elicit info from me. Sure, its happened occasionally, and my normal reaction is simply to deflect the probe.
More often than not responses (if I’ve initiated the exchange) are formal bordering on dismissive (yeah, I can see in their eyes that they think I’m scum!), but just occasionally I’ve had really good conversations. Ok, not very often, but it does happen.

You can put some sort of rationale to this (if you want) along the lines of trying to touch their humanity, or demonstrating to them that those engaged in, or seeking to report fairly on, protests are not just a bunch of wasters and scumbags, or whatever.
But the truth is simply that I’m the sort of person who prefers to be on good terms with folk unless they give me cause not to be. And that applies almost regardless of who they are (I’d probably draw the line at Tony Blair, George Bush et al, but hey, none of us are perfect!).
Sure, I can shout abuse with the best of them if occasion demands it, and I’ve a few sharp responses for those that try to talk down to me, but generally I find it preferable not to deliberately alienate people, providing I don’t have to compromise the things in which I believe.

So, having now probably laid the groundwork for arguments with some of the more die-hard activists, I can proceed with the tale.

One of the roles I found myself fulfilling at this year’s Climate Camp was that of photographer - in various capacities. Camp Photographer, photographer for the FitWatch people, and journalist-type person (see this post).
Well, certainly in the last two of those capacities I found myself almost literally rubbing shoulders periodically with the activists’ dreaded foe.
A few exchanges and conversations occurred, some of which were ok, others leaving me muttering “bastard” and similar expressions.

But one stands out head and shoulders above the rest. I’m convinced that I’ve finally met a copper who’s actually a real human being!

Chief Inspector Pendry of (would you believe it) the Metropolitan Police!!!

The first encounter was at second-hand and occurred in the village of Harmondsworth where the Kids Block march had come to a temporary halt, the cops wanting to go one way, the marchers another. So there was a rather noisy assembly at the crossroads leading into the village, the locals siding with the protesters and the cops determined not to give way.
But, although noisy and a few “pleasantries” tossed from either side, there was no real trouble.

So it was with complete astonishment that suddenly, out of the blue, a squad of riot cops in full gear comes trotting toward the crowd.
Unfortunately a mate and I were positioned between the protesters and the oncoming intimidators and my one thought was “Shit, we’re in trouble now”, rapidly followed by swivelling head to see if I could spot a hole to crawl into.
Didn’t stop me from firing off a few photos though and whilst so engaged some guy with a PA system (it may even have been the Rinky-Dink crew) drew everyone’s attention to what was happening.
Moments later, after milling around like lost sheep, the squad simply turned tail and disappeared from whence they came.
Then my mate reports to me that he’d overheard some senior cop (my Chief Inspector Pendry as I later learned) shouting the classic phrase “What the f*** are they doing here upsetting my protesters?” (or words to that effect!).

I found the notion that she’d sort of adopted the marchers as “her protesters” curiously delightful, reinforced by the sheer relief at seeing the nasties scurry away tails between legs. In fact, something about their entire behaviour reminded me a lot of the Keystone Kops.

The dilemma of which way the march should go was shortly thereafter settled to the relative satisfaction of all (some sort of compromise having been worked out) and everyone peacefully wandered down to the village green for a brief stop and a mingling with the locals.

I did hear tell that some of the cops just couldn’t shed their control mentality though, and sought to prevent access to the local hostelries. But apparently a landlord of one of the pubs made plain his dismay at losing out on such wonderful potential trade, and the cops moved away.
Not that my mate and I were too bothered; we’d already snuck in for our refreshments.

Eventually the assembly moved off, back up to the crossroads in resumption of the march to BAA.

At some stage along the route my mate and I, being way out in front with other media people, found ourselves talking with this police-type person mainly to find out what the current route was, and whether we were actually going in the right direction.
Turns out this is none other than the admirable Chief Inspector.

Well, the brief exchange turned into a conversation that, on and off, lasted virtually the rest of the march.
Not once did she try pumping us for information. Not once did she utter a single derogatory remark about the protesters, or the Camp itself. Indeed at one point she confessed to being somewhat impressed by the hardiness of the Campers spending a week-long sojourn in a field in not the best of weather.

She even shared with us where along the route we’d find somewhere for a quick cup of coffee and a toilet! (Vital things to know when you’re engaged in this sort of activity.)

The only explanation we could come up with to explain this completely bizarre behaviour was that she didn’t actually realise we were “embedded media” so to speak.
But now I doubt even that. For when we saw her again the following day her attitude toward us was exactly the same, yet its inconceivable that by then she hadn’t discovered, or been informed, of who we were.

Ok, the whole thing may just have been a huge con intended to lull us into changing our perception of the cops. But somehow I think not. She came across to both my mate and I as being perfectly genuine (and I think we’ve both probably had enough encouters to distinguish between false sincerity and the real thing). Yet even if we were both taken in, she’s gotta score big-time in terms of PR for the Met.
Perhaps if there were a few more like her events such as Climate Camp wouldn’t be so stressful for either side.

Chief Inspector Pendry… you’re worthy of respect!





“C’mon lads, let’s get ‘em!”

 


” ‘ang on a minute, someone don’t look too pleased”

 


“Oops… s’pose we’d best go back the way we came”

Climate Camp

Climate Camp 2007 - 006
Been back from Climate Camp for a few days now so thought it about time I jotted down a few thoughts. Ended up with an article far too long for a blog post, so posted it to TawNews instead!

a-camping we will go

Once again the Climate Campers prove their mettle by first defeating a wide-ranging injunction that BAA tried to obtain (now much limited in its scope - see previous post), and second by - for the second year running - establishing the campsite ahead of schedule.

Following useful info blatantly nicked from the Climate Camp website

We are on Sipson Lane, between the villages of Sipson and Harlington, North of Heathrow.

By public transport:

Train from Paddington to ‘Hayes and Harlington’ station.

From there bus 90, 140 or H98 heading South. Get off at the corner of Harlington High Street and walk West along Sipson Lane about 600 metres.

OR

About a 2 mile walk - south into Harlington village then as above.

OR

Go one station further on to West Drayton and take the 222 bus to the Western (Sipson) end of Sipson Lane.

Location Map

Staines is quite far away - if you want to make your own way to the site don’t go to Staines!

But if you get yourself to Staines railway station in West London by 10am on Tuesday 14th August, you will be greeted by our friendly welcome team and promptly transported via a magical mystery tour, to the camp! Staines railway station is very small so the Welcome Desk and pickup buses will be running from Spelthorne Leisure Centre, 5 minutes walk from the station.(There will also be lifts to the camp later in the day).

If you get lost trying to find the camp or any other enquiries then call 0207 3779088 . There will be someone manning the phone at the London Action Resource Centre 10am to 6pm from 2nd August who will be able to help you.

You will need to bring a tent – but there is no need to bring your own food. Camping will be organised into ‘Neighbourhoods’ – each with it’s own collective kitchen.

For a full list of things we recommend you bring go to the practicalities page.

Knowing your rights makes you stronger.Go to the legal briefing

When you first arrive be sure to go to the Welcome tent, where friendly faces will give advice. You may feel lost without them!

There will be medics, a legal team, a wellbeing area and a kids space on site. Children and families are very welcome.

You can pop down for just few days, a short visit, or stay for the whole camp.

The camp is collectively run. We all chip in and there are no leaders. The camp process uses consensus principles. It might be a good idea to read a little about this before you come to the camp. Check out the decision making page

If you would like to come to London to get involved before the camp your help would be very much appreciated. Call 020 7377 9088 (London Action Resource Centre)– and if no one picks up leave your name, number and message.

Information for people with particular access needs can be found on the practicalities page.

To find out about the workshops on workshops page. Further advice on bringing vehicles or dogs, and information on ‘take down’ can be found on the practicalities, page.

It might be a good idea to contact other people in your local area who are also coming to the camp. You should find contact details on the local groups page .

And of course – there will be 24 hours of mass action from midday Sunday 19th August to midday Monday 20th August. Again keep checking this site for more details.

Photos from last year’s Climate Camp:

2007 Climate Camp is a GO!

Some folk have been a tad concerned about the injunction that BAA sought - their intention obviously being to scupper the Camp for this year. DON’T BE DETERRED. Whatever you may have read in the mainstream media (that’s to say, no matter how they may have tried to spin the outcome of the hearing), the final form of the injunction has been much diminished in scope, and the Camp’s good to go.

Here’s text of an email from the Climate Camp networking group, which explains things very clearly…

Here is a bit more information about what actually happened with Monday’s
injunction outcome, which should hopefully clear up any confusion based on
unclear and misrepresentative press stories!

First and most important: the camp is NOT covered by the injunction, and
you will not be breaking the law by coming to the camp! The camp is going
ahead as planned – not because it’s ignoring an injunction, but because it
is not affected by the injunction.

Second, this was a victory for us and for freedom to protest, not for BAA.
BAA originally sought an incredibly wide-ranging, draconian injunction
that could have affected 5 million people and that covered a wide
geographical area including the Piccadilly line and parts of the M25
motorway. What they got was an injunction that is civil and not criminal
(ie. no additional powers of arrest), against 3 named individuals and the
group Plane Stupid, and with a much reduced geographical area over which
the injunction applies. EVERYONE is free to come to the camp WITHOUT
breaching the injunction, including those named on the injunction. In
other words, the judge denied most of the original injunction, and gave
BAA something much smaller and much less powerful.

However they tried to spin the story on Monday (by the way, the reason
their ‘BAA wins injunction’ story got out first is because they sneakily
started talking to the press before the hearing was over!), BAA are
definitely not the winners in this case. The entire hearing has been a
farce, with the judge at times confused, at times thoroughly unimpressed
at BAA’s inability to decide exactly what the injunction covered.
Embarrassment continued as BAA was denounced across the board, by everyone
from the big NGOs to Ken Livingstone and the political parties to civil
liberties groups. And finally, BAA were ordered to pay all court costs,
apart from Plane Stupid’s.

So, BAA got very little of what they were originally seeking, got nowhere in attempting to stop the camp, gave the camp loads of free publicity, and are now out of a considerable chunk of change. We won, not BAA. Loads of people have now heard about the camp who might not have previously; but equally some people might be worried that this injunction will affect them if they come to the camp. Please forward this email and help to spread the word amongst your networks that the camp is not covered by the injunction, and the outcome was in fact a real victory for protest at Heathrow this summer.

General questions / comments / suggestions can be sent to info(at)climatecamp.org.uk, or for more info check out www.climatecamp.org.uk

Please don’t try to send an email to climatecam(at)lists.riseup.net as only Camp for Climate Action groups can post to this list.

So, BAA got very little of what they were originally seeking, got nowhere
in attempting to stop the camp, gave the camp loads of free publicity, and
are now out of a considerable chunk of change. We won, not BAA.

Loads of people have now heard about the camp who might not have
previously; but equally some people might be worried that this injunction
will affect them if they come to the camp. Please forward this email and
help to spread the word amongst your networks that the camp is not covered
by the injunction, and the outcome was in fact a real victory for protest
at Heathrow this summer.

For more info check out the Climate Camp website

Also, see “This is Now a Protest for Democracy” by George Monbiot


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.