“We”

Just the other day I was pointed in the direction of an absolutely superb video… how its managed to elude my notice so far I really don’t know.

Essentially its a “fast-paced 64-minute documentary that covers the world politics of power, war, corporations, deception and exploitation… It visualizes the words of Arundhati Roy, specifically her famous “Come September” speech, where she spoke on such things as the war on terror, corporate globalisation, justice and the growing civil unrest.

Although I’d heard of her previously (particularly during all the antiwar stuff I was doing prior to Bush’s invasion of Iraq) I can’t recollect ever having seen her on the screen or wherever.
Now I have… I’m totally enamoured! Ms Roy’s presentation is superb and her “presence” (even through the medium of a miserable .wmv file) comes across really strongly. I cannot now imagine anyone presenting this vitally important subject-matter more compellingly.

The video’s a definite “must see” (if you haven’t done so already) and I’m sure that both the hardened activist and those new to the experience of “politicisation” (as the Met Police recently complained about!) will find it equally informative.

Below is a short preview (courtesy of YouTube) but the whole thing can be watched as streaming video on Google, or downloaded as a .wmv file from weroy.org.

I’ve set up a dedicated page for it on the main TaW site, which has all the access info.

embedded by Embedded Video

YouTube Direct “We”

This damned mind of mine

Y’know how it is that you sometimes get a tune in your head (usually some utterly superficial pop tune or advertising jingle) that plays over and over, and simply won’t be dispelled?

Well, since writing my last post I’ve been experiencing a rather similar phenomenon; though this time not a tune but a phrase.
Its that damned sentence I quoted from Faye Turney…
“I want everyone out there to know my story from my side, see what I went through.”

Having got totally fed up with it niggling away at my subconscious I’ve dragged it out into the light of day (or darkness of ridiculously early in the morning, in this particular case), and tried to analyse why its bugging me so much.

The only conclusion I’ve been able to arrive at is because of the subtext as it were… the attitude it betrays. And that attitude strikes me as one of utter self-indulgence, entirely inappropriate for someone serving in the Armed Forces.

I wonder if Ms Turney has paused to reflect on why she was in the Shatt al-Arab River in the first place.
Let’s consider that “why” shall we? Presumably she was ordered there by a superior officer. That order came about because our government decided to support Bush’s scheme to launch an unjustified and almost certainly illegal attack on a relatively defenceless country. As a consequence of which, hundreds of thousands of completely innocent Iraqis have suffered unimaginably. I wonder therefore if our Ms Turney is in the least interested in hearing their story, from their side, and trying to get an understanding of what they’ve been through?
And if she’s got the least concern for those victims of the heinous military aggression perpetrated by the combined US/UK Armed Forces, perhaps she should donate any and all money she acquires from peddling her “story” to one of the organizations seeking to alleviate the suffering and impoverishment her employers have caused.

US judge dismisses Rumsfeld torture lawsuit

Reuters AlertNet - US judge dismisses Rumsfeld torture lawsuit

WASHINGTON, March 27 Reuters - A U.S. federal judge dismissed on Tuesday a lawsuit seeking to hold former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other high-ranking military officers liable for the torture and abuse of Afghan and Iraqi prisoners, including some at Abu Ghraib prison.In throwing out the lawsuit, U.S. District Chief Judge Thomas Hogan ruled in the 58-page opinion that the defendants are entitled to immunity.

The plaintiffs had said they were stabbed, sexually abused, dunked in freezing water, and beaten while being hung upside down from the ceiling in Iraqs notorious Abu Ghraib prison and other U.S.-run facilities in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In his opinion, Hogan cited other court rulings that rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution generally do not extend to foreign citizens in other countries. The plaintiffs have no right to sue in U.S. court, he said.

Hogan said that allowing money damages against military officials during a war “would invite enemies to use our own federal courts to obstruct the armed forces ability to act decisively and without hesitation in defense of our liberty and national interests.”

more…

In other words, to act in contravention of international law without fear of reprisal. Hmm… wonder how he’d feel about the so-called “insurgents” in Iraq (in reality resistance fighters opposing an occupying force) using similar arguments?

Encampment to Stop the War - Day 1

AxisofLogic

The Encampment to Stop the War was pitched yesterday on the Washington Mall directly in front of the capital in full view of the Democrat-led congress demanding that they defund the U.S. war on the people of Iraq. It kicked off yesterday morning with 4 large trucks rolling into the Washington Mall, loaded with scaffolding, staging, conference room tents, medical supplies and all the equipment we needed to set up the Encampment. People began arriving to camp against the war at about noon. Some of those I interviewed came from Wisconsin, Arizona, Michigan, Missouri, Louisiana, North Carolina, Virginia, New York, Boston, Maine and others from in and around Washington DC. They came to set up their tents and demand that the Democrats in congress defund the war. It’s truly been a great day The positive spirit that only empowered people can know fueled us to get the work done – and there was a lot of good work Everyone pitched in to help set up conference-room size canopy tents as meeting places, a clinic for medical emergencies and our 4 p.m. press conference.

more…

Despite the often overt anti-Americanism of my rants, I have to confess a grudging admiration and respect for their courage in launching this huge protest. And make no mistake - it is a courageous act; for the American police have something of a reputation for dealing rather more “robustly” with what are perceived as anti-Establishment protests than do our own police forces (yet, anyway!).
(The brutalities that occurred during some of the anti-Vietnam War protests spring readily to mind.)

That said however, let’s just remind ourselves of what’s really driving this protest.
You’d like to think it was a stand on principle, or morality, of humanitarian concern for the victims of the American military, wouldn’t you? But no. Let’s not fool ourselves. What’s actually brought them out is the increasing damage being sustained by the American military - the rising numbers of body bags being flown home, the cripples returning from their Mid-East adventure.

I’m not saying that they shouldn’t protest, even if their motives are somewhat less than ideal. What I am saying is that, with all due regard for the entrenched American anti-war movement (for which I have the greatest respect) that’s always been vociferous in its outbursts, its a pity the latecomers that are now joining this protest weren’t moved to such passion at the very start of Bush’s bloody war, roused to anger by the injustice, immorality, and obscenity of it all. Had they done so, perhaps the reason to protest now wouldn’t even exist.
So the sub-text of such latecomers is really: it’s OK for America to wantonly attack other countries, just so long as the Yanks themselves don’t sustain losses. In other words, its OK for the Yanks to go and visit death and destruction on someone else - providing the “someone else” doesn’t retaliate, and providing the Yanks don’t get hurt in the process. And yet retaliation’s a good enough motive for the Yanks (remember what triggered this war in the first place? - And no, it wasn’t the alleged breach of UN sanctions by Iraq!).
Now what sort of mentality’s that; and is it any wonder the world’s in the shape its in?

Nor can they convincingly claim that they simply didn’t realise they were being hoodwinked into the war. On such a grave issue it behooves us all to double-check what our politicians and mainstream media squawk - after all, neither are renowned for their impartiality, honesty or transparency. And if these latecomers had managed to spare just a couple of hours of their time they could easily have discovered all the counter-arguments to Bush et al’s false allegations - they were all in the public domain, as all the antiwar types were readily revealing for months before the invasion.

[Addendum: Curiouser and curiouser… I’ve just now done a very quick surf of all the mainstream media websites, both here and US, and can find no mention of this protest. What gives? So if the MSM are covering it they’re certainly not doing so with the attention it deserves. 10:40 14.03.07]

The War on Terror Is the Leading Cause of Terrorism

AlterNet: War on Iraq: The War on Terror Is the Leading Cause of Terrorism

Its official: A new report shows that the U.S. has made the world more dangerous — not just for Americans, but for everyone.
Innocent people across the world are now paying the price of the “Iraq effect,” with the loss of hundreds of lives directly linked to the invasion and occupation by American and British forces.
An authoritative U.S. study of terrorist attacks after the invasion in 2003 contradicts the repeated denials of George Bush and Tony Blair that the war is not to blame for an upsurge in fundamentalist violence worldwide. The research is said to be the first to attempt to measure the “Iraq effect” on global terrorism.

more…
No surprises there then. Yet against this background what’s really surprising is the apparent gullibility (I say “apparent gullibility” cos if not gullibility the alternative must surely border on the criminal) of the mainstream media in still “toeing the party line” with regard to (amongst other Mid-East issues) Iran. And the continuing gullibility of large swathes of the public in buying into all the scaremongering.

War on the World

VIRTUAL CITIZENS - War on the World

On 10 January 2007, G. W. Bush announced his new “strategy” to “change America’s course in Iraq.”[1] The highlights are as follows:

(1) The new strategy for Iraq is an old set of tactics for policing Baghdad;

(2) Bush declared that American troops have been stupid and incompetent;

(3) Bush declared war on Iran (Iran has already attacked us); and

(4) Bush is not going to put up with sneaky, conniving, two-faced Muslims anymore.

read the full article…

The Unmentionable Hypocrisy: Hussein Hanged, Bush and Blair Remain in Power

» The Unmentionable Hypocrisy: Hussein Hanged, Bush and Blair Remain in Power

Saddam Hussein was hanged a week ago, today, for executing 148 people. Yet, even by conservative estimates, George W. Bush and Tony Blair are responsible for hundreds, or thousands, of times more deaths due to their war of aggression - the supreme international crime - in Iraq.But, while Saddam Hussein is hanged, Bush and Blair remain in power with apparent impunity.

Why the double standard?

Read the full post here…

US INVADES IRAN territory Today Jan 11- An Underreported Story

US INVADES IRAN territory Today Jan 11- An Underreported Story - Indian-American Org Sam Rao

US troops stormed into an Iranian consulate in Kurdish part of Iraq and seized equipment, computers and personnel. about 6 people were detained as US troops reportedly entered the Consulate of Iran.
As is well known and accepted by International law, Consulates and Embassies etc are over in territory and diplomatic immunity extends to the countries’ representatives & officials.

In a semantic sense, ” the War of Terror” is something most sane people will agree with. However, in the name of the War on Terror, its amazing how international and domestic laws are being totally bypassed.

This act of entering a consulate is definitely an act of War against a sovereign nation.
The “bending of rules” for the war on terror against Al Qaeda- a non government, unofficial entity- doesnot apply as Iran is a Republic and a nation state.

Interesting that this news has been under-reported!

Saddam Hussein executed in Iraq

BBC NEWS | World | Middle East | Saddam Hussein executed in Iraq

Former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has been executed by hanging at a secure facility in northern Baghdad for crimes against humanity.The news was confirmed to the BBC by the Iraqi deputy foreign minister.

Iraqi TV said the execution took place just before 0600 local time (0300GMT). A representative of the prime minister and a Sunni Muslim cleric were present.

Two co-defendants, Saddam Hussein’s half-brother and a former chief judge, are to be executed at a later date.

All three were sentenced to death by an Iraqi court on 5 November after a year-long trial over the 1982 killings of 148 Shias in the town of Dujail.

Read the full article…

So, Saddam Hussein has finally gone. Yet, with all the horrendous crimes he was accused of committing it strikes me as rather strange that they’ve rushed through his execution for a crime that, in his scale of misdeeds, was relatively minor.

Why not put a stay on the execution till he could be tried for all the many other crimes he’d been accused of committing.
It couldn’t be anything to do with the probability that, were his trials to have continued for a protracted period then yet more facts might have emerged (other than Saddam’s own rhetoric) about the complicity of the West in his crimes - could it? No, surely not.
Or are all the other accusations that have been made against him to go untried and untested in a court of law (even such a mockery of a “court of law” as that which tried Hussein) - so that they will remain forever unchallenged? Mighty convenient for the West.

Of course, the verdict and the sentence were a foregone conclusion.

And another foregone conclusion: I’ve been watching BBC News 24 throughout the early hours of this morning, part of which was devoted to a potted history of Saddam’s rise to power, and some of the events that led to today’s execution.
Thoroughly disgusted by their cherry-picking of the facts, at least it gives us a foretaste of what shape the “official history” will take. No surprises there either.

The only question remaining - now that everyone’s crowing about Saddam having finally been made accountable for his crimes - is when Bush and Blair will likewise been made accountable for the devastation they have wrought upon the peoples of Iraq?

Here’s an interesting link…

The Misguided Execution of Saddam Hussein

And another one…

Demand Accountability for U.S./Israeli War Crimes in Lebanon and Palestine

International Action Center

Diplomat’s suppressed document lays bare the lies behind the Iraq war

Independent Online Edition

The Government’s case for going to war in Iraq has been torn apart by the publication of previously suppressed evidence that Tony Blair lied over Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction.

A devastating attack on Mr Blair’s justification for military action by Carne Ross, Britain’s key negotiator at the UN, has been kept under wraps until now because he was threatened with being charged with breaching the Official Secrets Act.

more…


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.