yet another blog

"The country's biggest force, the Metropolitan police, is to lobby the attorney general… because officers believe that large sections of the population have become increasingly politicised"
Subscribe

Blunder after blunder after blunder

June 07, 2010 By: fotdmike Category: Antiwar, Human Rights, Terrorism

Interesting little item in Sunday’s online Guardian, “Israel forced to apologise for YouTube spoof of Gaza flotilla“.
Follows on from this past week’s events wherein the IDF attacked and boarded vessels of a humanitarian aid flotilla making its way to Gaza.

Boarded in international waters no less, and proceeded to kill some of those on board.

No joking matter really. Though apparently certain elements within the Israeli government thought it was a huge joke and put out a video clip on YouTube…

set to the tune of the 1985 charity single We Are the World, features Israelis dressed as Arabs and activists, waving weapons while singing: “We con the world, we con the people. We’ll make them all believe the IDF (Israel Defence Force) is Jack the Ripper.”

Wonder if the families of those that were killed will see the funny side of it?

Well, it seems that they’ve now apologised for this. But too late. The veil’s been drawn aside and given us a glimpse of the true arrogance with which the Israelis conduct themselves. To say nothing of their utter disregard for human life… other than their own of course.

Yes. Killing’s just a huge joke to them… providing its not Israelis being killed.

That’s blunder #1 then.

Blunder #2 takes the form of an audio clip that, in the highly edited version originally released by the Israelis, casts some of those taking part in the aid mission in a less than favourable light.
Some versions later the Israelis finally confessed their shenanigans and released a more complete version of the clip that imparts a wholly different impression.

Yet one more proof (were it needed) that Israeli statements and accusations can’t be trusted, and neither can their integrity. This wasn’t simply a case of a genuine mistake, but blatant doctoring of material to deliberately create a totally wrong impression.

Blunder #3 concerns their earlier claim that some members of the aid mission were linked to Al Qaeda

The Israeli army also backed down last week from an earlier claim that soldiers were attacked by al-Qaida “mercenaries” aboard the Gaza flotilla. An article appearing on the IDF spokesperson’s website with the headline: “Attackers of the IDF soldiers found to be al-Qaida mercenaries”, was later changed to “Attackers of the IDF Soldiers found without identification papers,” with the information about al-Qaida removed from the main article. An army spokesperson told the Guardian there was no evidence proving such a link to the terror organisation.

Basically, they lied.

Post to Twitter

An Open Letter to the Israeli Defense Forces

June 05, 2010 By: fotdmike Category: Antiwar, Human Rights, Terrorism, War Crimes

Dear Israeli Defense Forces

Just wanted to say that I thought it was real nice of you to welcome that so-called “humanitarian aid flotilla” into your waters (they are your waters, aren’t they?) in such a restrained manner.

After all, you could just have fired a few missiles into them and sunk those pesky ships. That would have been so much easier, and saved you so much trouble. And it wouldn’t have put your nice friendly helpful soldiers in harm’s way either.

Never mind that the rest of the world (well, the common people anyway) may have criticised you a little bit. After all, what would they know? And its not as though their opinions matter anyway. I mean, they’re not really part of the Master Race like yourselves are they?
And at least you could be assured that your stalwart friends in the American government (and indeed our own wonderful UK government) wouldn’t do or say anything to harm your interests.

But no, you chose the much kinder, compassionate (and, it has to be said, braver) option of sending your heroic soldiers to intercept that so-called “humanitarian aid flotilla” in your waters (they definitely are your waters, aren’t they?).

And for all your effort; your thoughtfulness and tolerance; what greeting do you get?

Those nasty little “activists” (and we all know that “activist” is really just another word for “terrorist” don’t we?) actually have the nerve to try and stop you boarding their ships. Oh the cheek of it!
To think they imagined they had some sort of right to try to stop you, soldiers of the great well-armed Master Race, from boarding their common-or-garden civilian ships just beggars belief.

Next thing you know they’ll be trying to claim they were only acting in self-defense! When its quite obvious to everyone that the whole thing was set up deliberately to provoke you. And that all the tens of thousands of pounds worth of aid on board was simply a ruse. Damned clever these activists terrorists.

And they actually had the audacity to use weapons against you! Real nasty dangerous hoses, and slingshots and stuff. Must have been terrifying indeed. A true ordeal. Lucky you guys just happened to have your guns with you and managed to shoot a few of them… several times so I understand. Just to make sure they were actually dead I suppose. Wise move.

The thing you don’t want to pay any attention to is when some naive people suggest that if you hadn’t tried boarding the ships in the first place then your oh-so-brave soldiers wouldn’t have been attacked.
No, don’t pay any attention to that. After all, likely not a grain of truth in it.
I’m sure if you hadn’t boarded those ships they would certainly have attacked all your boats and stuff, and forgotten all about delivering that so-called “aid” (all that tens of thousands of pounds worth of stuff) to Gaza. Probably thrown it overboard in fact. What with it being a ruse and all… just to provoke you.

After all, its not as though the Gazans need it, is it? What with you looking after them so brilliantly. And helping to repair all the damage and alleviate all the suffering that… er… you may have inadvertently caused. Not with any malicious intent of course. Oh no.
Problem is, the Gazans are so ungrateful. Its not everyone that has the chance of having a Master Race look after them and care for them, is it?
Last time I recollect it happening was somewhere in Europe a good, oh, 70 or so years ago. Guess you learned a lot from them, eh?

Though, if I may make a suggestion? It might be better to warn your wonderful soldiers that next time they go fully-armed against defenceless civilians those same defenceless civilians may just be silly enough to try to take the weapons away from your lads… what with not having any guns of their own and so forth. Just sayin’.

Of course I fully understand that’s not the sort of thing you’d normally expect to happen. Unarmed untrained civilians tackling brave well-trained fully-armed soldiers… whatever is the world coming to? Next thing you know people will be calling out for justice and “being called to account”, and independent investigations, and other such silly notions.

Though those civilians weren’t totally unarmed, were they? As you so helpfully inform us. Just as well you managed to photograph some of those really scary weapons they had with them.
That scarf-type thing for example. I’d rather not try to imagine what use they’d put that to. Probably try to strangle someone with it or something.

And those CDs! Wow! If they were thrown frisbee-style I guess they could quite easily take someone’s eye out. Or at least leave a nasty scratch. Unless the wind catches them of course. Little chance of that happening though… as there’s never any wind at sea is there?

And what about that axe? Soon as I saw that photograph of it I shuddered. Real evil-looking thing. Not the sort of thing you’d expect to find on a boat at all really. I just hope you managed to get a photograph of someone actually using it against your oh-so-brave soldiers.

Talking of photographs however… here’s a useful little tip (speaking as a photographer myself you understand, and only trying to be helpful). Next time you ask your people to take photographs that could conceivably be used as some sort of evidence it might be an idea to get them to reset the date and time on the cameras first. Usually to be found in the menu settings that will be displayed on the LCD screen under something like “date/time”.

Otherwise some nasty suspicious types might check the exif data embedded in the photographs and try to question the credibility of the images… implying maybe that they weren’t taken quite when (or even where) you said they were. Have to watch out for those sort of things you know. Not that you’d ever fabricate, or deceive, or manipulate the truth of course, would you?

Though I do think you’ve missed a trick, if I may say so.

What about the WMD? All terrorists have weapons of mass destruction nowadays, surely. I mean, you can’t be a proper terrorist nowadays without at least some tiddly little WMDs. Not a self-respecting one at least. (Um… you have WMD as well, don’t you? The only Middle East state to have them I do believe. Though why you’d need them is a bit of a puzzle to me. Guess its to protect you from all those nasty smelly neighbours of yours, with their sticks and stones and stuff. Still, I suppose its all part of being a Master Race and dominating everyone else.)

Anyway, those WMD. There’s bound to have been some on board. Especially as some of those terrorists, as you so helpfully informed us all, had links to Al Qaeda. And even if you hadn’t found any you could always have said you had “intelligence” that suggested there were some. Isn’t that what all self-respecting States do nowadays? I mean, no-one minds a little deception now and then, just between friends.

By the way, this would be the same Al Qaeda that was oh-so-active in Iraq before your friends the ever-so-truthful Americans brought law and order to that country, would it?

You know, Osama bin Laden’s highly organised and absolutely terrifying outfit. According to what your friends the Americans say, anyway.

Talking of whom, what about Osama bin Laden? Are you sure he wasn’t on board one of those ships as well? After all, he seemed to turn up pretty much everywhere else.

And what about the “Rachel Corrie” then? You know, that silly little ship that was named after some woman or other. That lass who rather carelessly got herself run over by one of your bulldozers whilst it was going about its customary business of knocking someone’s house down. I’m sure you must remember her?

Anyway, the “Rachel Corrie”. Whatever were you thinking of? No guns? No bloodshed? No massacre?
Come on now, surely you can do better than that? Don’t tell me you’ve been paying any attention whatsoever to all those silly little protests around the world? And what other governments have been saying. The Turks for example. No, surely not. When have you ever done that?

But, if you don’t mind my saying, you’ve slipped up badly with the “Rachel Corrie”. Tarnished your hard-earned reputation as a rogue state sort of thing. But I’m sure you’ll soon be back on track again.

Well, I guess that’s about it for the moment.

Oh, there was one other little thing. Something you may not have thought of, but I’m sure it would help out enormously with maintaining that reputation you’ve worked so hard to acquire.

Fashion! There… bet you’d not thought of that. You really should think about changing your uniforms to something more appropriate. The colour for example. Black would be really good. And jackboots. Nice shiny black jackboots. Maybe an armband too. And you could have little insignia… those metal badge things all the best soldiers have pinned to their jacket collars. A skull and crossbones for example.

Just a few ideas for you to mull over.

Yours very sincerely,
fotdmike

Post to Twitter

Eyewitness accounts of the Israeli atrocity

June 04, 2010 By: fotdmike Category: Antiwar, Human Rights, Terrorism

The BBC (not particularly well-known for criticising the Israelis, or indeed providing unbiased reporting about repression of the Palestinians) has published the following eyewitness accounts of the Israeli attack on the Gaza Aid Flotilla that occurred during the early hours of 31st May.

Activists describe Israeli raid on Gaza aid convoy

UK Gaza activist Sarah Colborne – ship raid ‘surreal’

Inevitably the Israeli spin machine has kicked into high gear, their principal line seeming to be:

Israel maintains its commandos were attacked first. Officials say soldiers were confronted with “knives, clubs and other weapons” when they landed on the Mavi Marmara and they opened fire in self-defence.

Even were that true (which, given the Israelis’ predilection for distortions and downright lies, I very much doubt) it rather begs the question of what the hell were they doing launching an armed assault on, and boarding, civilian ships in what I am led to believe were international waters?

Under such circumstances my view is that the passengers and crew of those ships were fully justified in seeking to defend themselves and seeking to repel the boarders… using whatever means they had at their disposal.

And quite clearly those means did not include firearms. So, even if there were some microscopic grain of truth in the Israeli allegations how then do they justify such a disproportionate response?

At time of writing the aid ship MV Rachel Corrie that was part of the original flotilla is still on its way to Gaza, due to arrive at about 0800 Saturday morning (5th June).

Pointless speculating on what the Israelis may or may not do. Optimists may believe that, following the publicity and worldwide protests in response to the Israeli attack on the main body of the flotilla, they will be more restrained in the morning.

Personally, I doubt it. The Israelis are not well-known for improving their behaviour in response to world-wide condemnation of their actions.

Edit 04.06.2010 @ 20:41 – This too, from The Guardian…
Gaza flotilla activists were shot in head at close range

Edit 05.06.2010 @ 01:09 – And this, from gulfnews.com…
From tear gas to bullets: Gunshots shattered call to prayer

Post to Twitter

Those bastards are at it again!

May 31, 2010 By: fotdmike Category: Antiwar, Human Rights, Terrorism

Image courtesy Carlos Latuff, who says:

I beg you all of you that make this tragedy circulate ad nauseam
through the Internet along my cartoon. People are free for reproducing
it on blogs, papers, magazines, TV, everywhere.

Post to Twitter

So this is “policing by consent”… or “facilitating legal protest”?

February 02, 2009 By: fotdmike Category: Antiwar, Human Rights, Police State

Peace and Justice for Palestine – March against the Gaza massacre London 3 January 2009. A personal account of riot police charges in Hyde Park underpass

After a week of brutal and disproportionate violence by the Israeli government against the Palestinians, we joined thousands of others gathered at Londons Embankment to march for peace and justice.

It was a brilliant display of solidarity with the Palestinians, but the provocative behaviour of riot police in panic mode escalated an otherwise peaceful demonstration. We are ordinary citizens, who were marching for peace, but who were terrified by series of batoned charges in the Hyde Park Underpass. Conveniently, it meant the police violence went unseen and unrecorded by the TV camera crews, so this is our account for those who werent there.

Post to Twitter

  • Commenting

    Visitors are invited, and welcome, to comment but must be registered and logged in to do so.
    All comments are moderated. Before adding your comment please make sure you're familiar with the "House Rules".

  • Categories

  • Historical


yet another blog is using WP-Gravatar