Photographs like this may soon become illegal!

Sack Parliament Protest, London, 2006

Yep! According to some proposed legislation currently “going through the process” apparently I could get up to ten years in jail for taking a photograph like the above and publishing it in future!

Read Terror Law and Photography on photojournalist Marc Vallee’s blog.

Worrying implications indeed!

As an article on Indymedia so succinctly puts it:

“If a police officer behaves badly and oppressively we [activists] have been known to criticise them on the internet. Furthermore it has always been commonsense to jot down police collar numbers on demos and take photos a) for legal reasons to identify police breaking the law, to identify police behaving well, to help clarify matters in both criminal and civil courts. Intelligence on police gathered by activists has helped to acquit innocent activists, enabled activists to sue police and correctly identify the culprits. None of this has ever been used in order to use violence against the police let alone terrorism but we can hazard a guess that they might use this proposed legislation against us. What if MI5 infiltrate a group and that agent is discovered? Will it become an offence to warn other activists? Will it be an offence to after having suspicions raised about a fellow activist to make a few enquiries if the “activist” is an undercover cop?”

And there’s some related info on Indymedia here.

At the very least this proposed legislation will constitute yet another encroachment on individual freedoms in this country whilst at the same time giving even greater power and freedom from accountability to the cops, thereby edging us one step closer to becoming a true Police State.

As well as making the job of the photojournalist that much more difficult than it already is.

Also posted at Adventures of an Idiot

More on my previous post about this year’s Climate Camp

Further to the totally disproportionate policing of this year’s Camp at Kingsnorth in Camp, the following Press Release has just been issued by the media people at the Climate Camp website…

Police spend £6 million on heavy handed policing of Kingsnorth Climate Camp

23 September 2008
For immediate release

A Freedom of Information request made by the BBC has revealed that the
cost of policing the Camp for Climate Action in Kent in August came to
£5.9 million.

The policing of the camp, including indiscriminate use of stop and search,
frequent use of helicopters and a number of violent incursions on to the
camp over the course of the week, was accused of being ‘heavy handed’ and
‘disproportionate’ by critics ranging from MEP Caroline Lucas to Labour MP
Colin Challen.

“This has been an outrageous waste of public money,” said camp participant
Kevin Smith. “It’s money that has been spent protecting E.On’s profit
margins, clamping down on people’s civil liberties and trying to prevent a
much needed public debate on coal and climate change from taking place.”

“This £6 million wasn’t just spent on the day of action against
Kingsnorth,” said Janie Shiraz. “It was mostly spent over the course of
the week in stopping and searching every man, woman and child entering the
site, it was spent keeping local residents awake with the helicopter all
night, and it was spent on police running around on site with nothing to
do as people sat in tents trying to talk about climate change.
‘Disproportionate response’ doesn’t even begin to cover it.”

Wainscott resident Andy Rogers said: “I attended the camp and I feel that
the underhanded and incredibly intimidating use of political policing at
the camp was an out and out infringement of my human rights, including my
freedom of speech and the right under law to attend a peaceful protest.
Surely six million pounds of what is essentially tax payers’ money would
have been better spent introducing a moratorium on coal fired power
stations”.

Camp for Climate Action activists have vowed to target the power station
and its owners E.ON with an ongoing direct action campaign if approval is
given for a new plant.

ENDS

For more information, phone 07772 861 099 or 0793 209 6677, or email
press (at) climatecamp.org.uk

www.climatecamp.org.uk

Incommunicado

As of Sunday 3rd (i.e., the day after tomorrow!) don’t expect much activity either on this blog or my photoblog for a few days. Well, prob’ly closer to a coupla weeks actually.
For I be off on my rambles again. This time to the Climate Camp that’s even now in process of being set up near Kingsnorth Power Station in northeast Kent.

Well, I say “in process of being set up”. That’s when they can manage to do the setting up in between bully-boy incursions by the local Gestapo… um, sorry, I meant political police. Um… no, what I actually meant was “officers of Kent’s constabulary”.

Apparently, within 24 hours or so of the site being “claimed” the local boys in blue swarmed all over the place, searching, using pepper spray, arresting, and generally being a bit intimidatory. Nothing new there then.

No doubt they saw it as payback time for when a police incursion was made at the Climate Camp last year, situated near Heathrow.
A detachment of cops marched on… and were very promptly marched off again by the assembled campers, who quite rightly objected to such arrogant tactics. A few red faces in the cop canteen that night probably.
In fact, thinking about it, the cops didn’t have a very good time of it last year. What with being unceremoniously ejected from the Camp and then, in Harmondsworth village, the lovely Chief Inspector Pendry sending a detachment of riot cops away with a flea in their ear (see this), they’ve got a lot of ground to make up.
Which is to say nothing of one cop being thrown from her horse in the “Battle of the Beanfield”.

So, this time around they have apparently managed to seize a number of items that they claim could be used to cause criminal damage, including such offensive things as kids’ crayons and a couple of board games. Wow!
And that’s to say nothing of their seizure of stuff intended to help construct the camp and make it a relatively comfortable, safe, and hygienic place for later arrivals. (Bearing in mind its not just your hardened activist that comes to Climate Camp, but also folk who simply want to find out about the issues, or learn the skills required to develop an environmentally friendly and sustainable lifestyle, and elderly people, and disabled folk, and kids… in other words, a fairly representative cross-section of society as a whole.)

This article on Indymedia has the full story.

Yet the Camp’s not toally without supporters in the Establishment. Check out this article by the parliamentarian Chris Davies published in today’s Guardian newspaper, which also gives some background to the issues that the Camp’s all about.

Of course, there’s a subtext to this recent escapade by the cops. Quite aside from any “legitimate” reason they may claim to have for such heavy-handed policing, one can’t help but wonder whether part of their ploy is not just to “assert their authority” but also to deter others from coming to the Camp.
That motivation (i.e., the suppression of political dissent and activism) quite clearly has a large part to play in their deployment of FIT officers at “political” events, so its reasonable to suppose that such motivation may well have informed this recent “raid”.

So when are they gonna wake up and realise that if anything it just makes the committed activist even more determined to act, as much in protest against the repression as against the issue at hand.

And talking of FIT, fitwatch have today circulated a callout for fitwatchers to come to the Camp. I quote:

“please forward x

Celebrate Fitwatch’s 1st Birthday at Climate Camp

This year’s Climate Camp will also celebrate Fitwatch’s first outing to a major protest. Since then we have gone from strength to strength.
Use Fitwatch tactics all week, and join us to celebrate our anniversary on the day of mass action (9th August). Together we can render the FIT ineffective, and you too can experience the pleasure of forcing a cameraman to retreat.

During the year, we have received criticism on our blog for being “professional protesters”. However, we agree. We take protest seriously. We want to be effective, and to do this we need reclaim our anonymity.
Fitwatch - bring the professional back into protesting!”

Needless to say, this heightened cop activity right from the off won’t deter me from my plans, as I suspect goes for a lot of other folk as well.

So there you have it. Blogging silence from me for at least a week or so (who was that who just said “Phew, thank heaven for that”?).

Oh, almost forgot to mention… the Climate Camp website’s here!

De Menezes shot for threatening manner

Just in case you miss it in the mainstream media…

Scotsman.com News - De Menezes shot for threatening manner
De Menezes shot for threatening manner
JOHN-PAUL FORD ROJAS

JEAN Charles de Menezes was killed because he acted in an “aggressive and threatening manner” when challenged, a lawyer for the police said yesterday.

Climate Camp Tales

I have to confess, its not entirely unknown for me to be somewhat scathing of the cops.
Not generally when they’re performing their normal “bobby-type” duties you understand (although even then I’ve had a few run-ins with the traffic cops from time to time) but moreso when they’re peforming tasks that could be perceived as serving a political agenda. Like providing protection for war criminals (a la the G8 summit) or for arms dealers, or snooping on innocent protesters, or suppressing legitimate political dissent.
And I’m not overly impressed with their deceitfulness (sometimes moving over into actual lying), their hypocrisy, their bully-boy tactics, their preconceptions, and their seeming inability to distinguish between hardened criminals and political activists (who generally are fairly law-abiding folk but with a social conscience).

However, I’m not exactly one of those journalist-types that seem to be anti-police regardless of circumstance - almost on principle, sort of thing.
Almost inevitably at any gathering of activists where the cops are likely to be lurking one hears the old refrain “Don’t talk to the cops. Even when they seem to be ok they’ll only try to get information from you”.
Well, let me set the record straight: that’s only a generalisation, and more often than not completely untrue - and I think I’m probably old enough now to recognise fishing when it occurs!

There are few events I’ve attended where at some stage or other I’ve not talked to one or another of the assembled boys in blue, and its not been very often where an attempt’s been made to elicit info from me. Sure, its happened occasionally, and my normal reaction is simply to deflect the probe.
More often than not responses (if I’ve initiated the exchange) are formal bordering on dismissive (yeah, I can see in their eyes that they think I’m scum!), but just occasionally I’ve had really good conversations. Ok, not very often, but it does happen.

You can put some sort of rationale to this (if you want) along the lines of trying to touch their humanity, or demonstrating to them that those engaged in, or seeking to report fairly on, protests are not just a bunch of wasters and scumbags, or whatever.
But the truth is simply that I’m the sort of person who prefers to be on good terms with folk unless they give me cause not to be. And that applies almost regardless of who they are (I’d probably draw the line at Tony Blair, George Bush et al, but hey, none of us are perfect!).
Sure, I can shout abuse with the best of them if occasion demands it, and I’ve a few sharp responses for those that try to talk down to me, but generally I find it preferable not to deliberately alienate people, providing I don’t have to compromise the things in which I believe.

So, having now probably laid the groundwork for arguments with some of the more die-hard activists, I can proceed with the tale.

One of the roles I found myself fulfilling at this year’s Climate Camp was that of photographer - in various capacities. Camp Photographer, photographer for the FitWatch people, and journalist-type person (see this post).
Well, certainly in the last two of those capacities I found myself almost literally rubbing shoulders periodically with the activists’ dreaded foe.
A few exchanges and conversations occurred, some of which were ok, others leaving me muttering “bastard” and similar expressions.

But one stands out head and shoulders above the rest. I’m convinced that I’ve finally met a copper who’s actually a real human being!

Chief Inspector Pendry of (would you believe it) the Metropolitan Police!!!

The first encounter was at second-hand and occurred in the village of Harmondsworth where the Kids Block march had come to a temporary halt, the cops wanting to go one way, the marchers another. So there was a rather noisy assembly at the crossroads leading into the village, the locals siding with the protesters and the cops determined not to give way.
But, although noisy and a few “pleasantries” tossed from either side, there was no real trouble.

So it was with complete astonishment that suddenly, out of the blue, a squad of riot cops in full gear comes trotting toward the crowd.
Unfortunately a mate and I were positioned between the protesters and the oncoming intimidators and my one thought was “Shit, we’re in trouble now”, rapidly followed by swivelling head to see if I could spot a hole to crawl into.
Didn’t stop me from firing off a few photos though and whilst so engaged some guy with a PA system (it may even have been the Rinky-Dink crew) drew everyone’s attention to what was happening.
Moments later, after milling around like lost sheep, the squad simply turned tail and disappeared from whence they came.
Then my mate reports to me that he’d overheard some senior cop (my Chief Inspector Pendry as I later learned) shouting the classic phrase “What the f*** are they doing here upsetting my protesters?” (or words to that effect!).

I found the notion that she’d sort of adopted the marchers as “her protesters” curiously delightful, reinforced by the sheer relief at seeing the nasties scurry away tails between legs. In fact, something about their entire behaviour reminded me a lot of the Keystone Kops.

The dilemma of which way the march should go was shortly thereafter settled to the relative satisfaction of all (some sort of compromise having been worked out) and everyone peacefully wandered down to the village green for a brief stop and a mingling with the locals.

I did hear tell that some of the cops just couldn’t shed their control mentality though, and sought to prevent access to the local hostelries. But apparently a landlord of one of the pubs made plain his dismay at losing out on such wonderful potential trade, and the cops moved away.
Not that my mate and I were too bothered; we’d already snuck in for our refreshments.

Eventually the assembly moved off, back up to the crossroads in resumption of the march to BAA.

At some stage along the route my mate and I, being way out in front with other media people, found ourselves talking with this police-type person mainly to find out what the current route was, and whether we were actually going in the right direction.
Turns out this is none other than the admirable Chief Inspector.

Well, the brief exchange turned into a conversation that, on and off, lasted virtually the rest of the march.
Not once did she try pumping us for information. Not once did she utter a single derogatory remark about the protesters, or the Camp itself. Indeed at one point she confessed to being somewhat impressed by the hardiness of the Campers spending a week-long sojourn in a field in not the best of weather.

She even shared with us where along the route we’d find somewhere for a quick cup of coffee and a toilet! (Vital things to know when you’re engaged in this sort of activity.)

The only explanation we could come up with to explain this completely bizarre behaviour was that she didn’t actually realise we were “embedded media” so to speak.
But now I doubt even that. For when we saw her again the following day her attitude toward us was exactly the same, yet its inconceivable that by then she hadn’t discovered, or been informed, of who we were.

Ok, the whole thing may just have been a huge con intended to lull us into changing our perception of the cops. But somehow I think not. She came across to both my mate and I as being perfectly genuine (and I think we’ve both probably had enough encouters to distinguish between false sincerity and the real thing). Yet even if we were both taken in, she’s gotta score big-time in terms of PR for the Met.
Perhaps if there were a few more like her events such as Climate Camp wouldn’t be so stressful for either side.

Chief Inspector Pendry… you’re worthy of respect!





“C’mon lads, let’s get ‘em!”

 


” ‘ang on a minute, someone don’t look too pleased”

 


“Oops… s’pose we’d best go back the way we came”

Policing in America

Is it any wonder that the US is increasingly being perceived as a rogue and terrorist nation when its domestic policing leaves so much to be desired.

By chance I came across this video clip of a police officer in Hot Springs, Arkansas, arresting youngsters for, of all things, skateboarding! What completely amazed me wasn’t just the fact of their arrest, but the manner in which that was carried out. Watch for yourself…

embedded by Embedded Video

YouTube Direct Skateboarding in Hot Springs, AK

So completely bizarre did this seem to me that I was prompted to email the Chief of Police there. Here’s my message…

For the attn. of Chief of Police, Bobby Southard
641 Malvern Avenue Hot Springs, Arkansas 71901

Sir,

I’ve recently had the privilege of watching a video clip of a police officer arresting some skateboarding kids. As if that weren’t sufficiently ridiculous, I watched in complete amazement bordering on disbelief as this particular officer (probably twice the weight of each of the kids he attempted to arrest) forced them face-down on the ground, threatened to spray them, and handcuffed them.

I’m intrigued to know whether this is standard operating procedure for American police officers, or is it unique to your particular jurisdicton?

“Disproportionate response” is a phrase that springs to my mind; “over-reaction” is another; “abuse of office” yet a third.

If this is indeed standard operating procedure at grassroots level in your domestic law enforcement agencies it helps to explain so much about the exreme human rights abuses and blatant disregard for the Rule of Law demonstrated by your federal government.

Just thought you’d be interested to know that this officer’s despicable behaviour has attracted the avid attention of people as far away as here in the UK.

If anyone else fancies sending a message of greeting to the Chief of Police there, contact details are as follows:

Phone: (501) 321-6789
Fax: (501) 321-6708
Chief of Police, Bobby Southard
email: bsouthard@cityhs.net
641 Malvern Avenue Hot Springs, Arkansas 71901

Why people hate cops

The article “Why People Hate Cops” was posted to Insurgent American  on 28th May ‘07, though I’ve only just stumbled across it. As a summary of the role of the police in 21st century Western society it is superb.

Customarily one would reproduce the first para, or extracts from the start of an article, to introduce the topic. Breaking with that tradition, here’s what’s virtually the final para…

Think about the stories you just told me. Think about how the cops treated you. Think about their perspective on you that they kept trying to get you to see? What is it about that perspective? What are they feeling toward you? Think about all the cop shows you see. What do the cops feel toward those they encounter? Contempt, at best. More likely hatred. Think about the looks on cops’ faces when they walk up to give you a ticket. Think about all the stories you have ever heard about the police. Yes, we all have a good story here or there involving police treating us well, but think about your experience and the experiences of those you know. What do all of those stories have in common? Think about the question you asked: why do so many people hate the police? I think the answer is staring us in the face, especially when it is cops who are doing the staring. I think a lot of people hate the police because the police hate us first.

Police to stop and question without just cause

Whilst I personally don’t have a particular problem with being stopped and questioned by the police regarding my identity and movements I firmly believe this is an extension of police powers that has to be rigorously opposed on principle.

Indeed, it seems to me that much of the anti-terrorist legislation that Blair and his government have introduced is politically motivated and deeply flawed.
Terrorism is a criminal act and, other than extending the powers of the police and the State to control and dictate to the population, I still fail to see how all the new anti-terrorist legislation is that much superior to existing criminal law in dealing with terrorists.

What it has achieved, unquestionably, is a further erosion of civil liberties and human rights and a reversal of many of the principles of Common Law that have been cherished for so long.

And now, with this new piece of proposed legislation, we will move another step closer to a world in which the people serve the State, rather than the State serving the people - serfdom in other words!

Moreover it will undoubtedly feed into the arrogance and authoritarianism that the police are only too willing to demonstrate nowadays.
That such increased powers will be abused by those who disingenuously claim they act by the “consent of the people” goes without saying. Even more worrying though is the virtual certainty that the principal victims of this new power will be those least able to defend or speak out for themselves - the young, the poor, the uneducated, the minority groups etc; and of course all those who stand in opposition to current political trends - the protestors, the demonstrators, the activists.

=======

AFP - Monday, May 28 04:11 am
uk.news.yahoo.com

LONDON (AFP) - Prime Minister Tony Blair Sunday accused courts and parliament of putting the rights of suspects before national security as it emerged that police may get powers to stop and question people in the street.

Writing in The Sunday Times, Blair argued that the disappearance last week of three terror suspects under control orders, a form of house arrest, was due to society’s mixed-up priorities rather than government mistakes.

“The fault is not with our services or, in this instance, with the Home Office (interior ministry). We have chosen as a society to put the civil liberties of the suspect, even if a foreign national, first,” Blair wrote.

“I happen to believe this is misguided and wrong.”

A government proposal to grant police officers powers to stop and question people under anti-terror laws also emerged Sunday to a volley of criticism, with a member of Blair’s own cabinet joining the sceptics.

Northern Ireland Secretary Peter Hain, who is running for the Labour party deputy leadership, warned that the move could become “the domestic equivalent of Guantanamo Bay.”

The laws could not be passed before Blair leaves office and hands over to finance minister Gordon Brown at the end of next month.

Shami Chakrabarti, of civil rights campaigners Liberty, accused Blair of “political machismo, a legacy moment.”

“Stopping and questioning anyone you like will backfire because people will be being criminalised,” she said.

The Sunday Times said that anyone who refused to cooperate could be charged with obstructing the police and fined up to 5,000 pounds (7,371 euros, 9,923 dollars).

The measures are currently in place in Northern Ireland and Irish premier Bertie Ahern told Sky News television that it would be “a pity” if the powers, which had been due to be ditched there, were kept on.

Elsewhere, police currently have the power to stop and search individuals on “reasonable grounds for suspicion” that they have committed an offence but have no rights to ask for their identity and movements.

The proposal came after three men went on control orders went on the run Tuesday — Lamine and Ibrahim Adam, aged 26 and 20, and Cerie Bullivant, 24.

The Adams pair are the brothers of Anthony Garcia, 25, who was imprisoned last month for his role in a fertiliser bomb plot aimed at attacking targets in London and across Britain.

Blair’s government stepped up its approach to terrorism after the US attacks on September 11, 2001 and again after four British-born Islamist suicide bombers killed 52 commuters and injured hundreds of others in London on July 7, 2005.

Victory for anti-war protesters

» Victory for anti-war protesters - RINF Alternative News

Campaigners have won a legal battle to prove their rights to protest were violated when police stopped them from attending an anti-war demonstration.

About 120 Iraq war protesters were held on coaches by police near RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire in March 2003.

The High Court and Court of Appeal had already ruled police acted unlawfully in holding protesters on the coaches.

But on Wednesday Law Lords ruled police did violate the right to freedom of expression and lawful assembly.

This overturned a previous High Court ruling that police did not violate the protesters’ rights in this respect.

Five Law Lords also dismissed a cross-appeal by the police against the “unlawful” decision to hold protesters on the coaches.

more…

Police want power to crack down on offensive demo chants and slogans

Police want power to crack down on offensive demo chants and slogans

Police are to demand new powers to arrest protesters for causing offence through the words they chant and the slogans on their placards and even headbands.

The country’s biggest force, the Metropolitan police, is to lobby the attorney general, Lord Goldsmith, because officers believe that large sections of the population have become increasingly politicised, and there is a growing sense that the current restrictions on demonstrations are too light.

more…

Could it be perhaps that the police are mistaking moral outrage for “increasing politicisation”? Outrage at the increasing hypocrisy, dishonesty, and venality of Blair and his cronies.

And there can be no greater or more compelling evidence of whom the police really serve than their support for this repressive proposal.

Ah well, just one step nearer to bloody revolution!

(And incidentally, “offence” to whom?…)


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.